দীপ্ত নিউজ
International

Entertainer Russell Brand Found Guilty by London Jury

প্রকাশ:
Entertainer Russell Brand Found Guilty by London Jury

A jury at Southwark Crown Court in London has convicted entertainer Russell Brand of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault. The verdicts followed a four-week trial examining allegations involving six different women that spanned the period between 1999 and 2009, a time when Brand was one of Britain’s most prominent media figures. Get the latest news and analysis on podcast Russell Brand on Trial – available on Sounds, YouTube, iPlayer, or wherever you get your podcasts. No matter how famous or powerful they may be, he added: “I hope this conviction sends a clear message that no one is above the law. He seized opportunities to assault the women around him, as his career took off. Allegations about Brand’s behaviour first emerged in the media in September 2023. And with his own radio programmes on stations including Radio 2 and 6 Music, brand first rose to fame as a stand-up comedian and became a household name as host of TV shows such as Big Brother’s Big Mouth. Starring in films including Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Get Him To The Greek, he went on to establish a Hollywood career.

During the proceedings, the jury found Brand guilty of raping a fan following a stand-up performance at the Hammersmith Apollo in 2009. He was also convicted of groping an MTV employee at a Soho bar in 2004, kissing and groping a worker at the Capital Radio building during 2004 or 2005, and sexually assaulting a Channel 4 staffer in 2009 by forcing her to perform a massage. The jury reached these conclusions after eight-and-a-half hours of deliberation.

Conversely, Brand was acquitted of two additional rape charges and one count of attempted indecent assault. Regarding the specific 1999 incident at a cabaret show during the Labour Party conference in Bournemouth, the jury found him not guilty. He was also cleared of an allegation involving an attempt to drag an MTV employee into a restroom for an indecent assault in 2001.

Mr Justice Bennathan, the presiding judge, denied Brand’s application for bail, ordering him into custody over the weekend. He warned the 51-year-old to prepare for a significant custodial sentence when he returns to court this coming Monday. The judge dismissed a request for weekend bail, noting that despite familial considerations, there were substantial concerns regarding the defendant’s willingness to return to face his sentencing given his considerable resources. According to the judge, “I regret the hardship caused to the children, of course” after being told that Brand would like bail over the weekend to explain the convictions to his children. According to but he, Brand “has considerable resources”, adding: “Whatever the good intentions of the family and the defendant today, I think there are substantial grounds to fear he might in the end not feel able to come along and face his sentence. But that “none of it was unlawful”, his barrister told jurors that Brand “had an immense amount of sex”.

Following the verdict, it was revealed that Brand is the subject of separate, ongoing rape allegations made by two other women.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed that their investigation into these claims remains ongoing, noting that officers have already questioned the entertainer in relation to these matters. Brand faced further questioning from officers in July 2025.

During the trial, Brand had testified that he was once extremely promiscuous and obsessed with sex, admitting he used his celebrity status to facilitate sexual access.

However, he maintained that all sexual encounters were consensual and denied all charges brought against him, characterizing the legal proceedings as a media conspiracy. Brand had claimed to be the victim of a media conspiracy to paint him as a sexual predator and insisted in court that consent was “more important than sex itself”.

Detective Superintendent Andy Furphy commended the victims for their extraordinary resilience in reliving traumatic experiences under intense public scrutiny, stating that Brand used his fame to exploit women. According to he, He had “dedicated a lot of my life to what seems now beyond reckless, philandering, and idiocy”.

Senior crown prosecutor David Roberts described the entertainer as a predatory manipulator with an insatiable desire for control. Several media organizations, including, Channel 4, and The Times, have expressed solidarity with the women involved, acknowledging the courage required to bring these cases forward.

Reaffirmed its commitment to preventing the abuse of power within the industry, reiterating an apology to former staff members who previously felt unable to report concerns about Brand’s conduct while he worked at the corporation between 2006 and 2008. Channel 4 also acknowledged the profound impact of these crimes, while The Times and The Sunday Times highlighted the vital contributions of women who participated in investigative efforts but whose cases did not reach the court. Brand was also confronted with his own words from his 2007 book in which he claimed sex was a “birthright” and friends who revealed his relentless pursuit of sleeping with 5,000 women. So too did his sense of entitlement, as his profile grew. At the centre of every assault was an abuse of power and sexual greed, with a complete disregard for the impact of his actions, although his tactics varied. Political and religious commentator, in recent years he has reinvented himself as an online social. According to a spokesperson, There could be “no place for the abuse of power” and added: “Across the industry we must work together to ensure that anyone who suffers at someone else’s hand feels able to report it, that their concerns are taken seriously and that they are listened to.

Russell Brand, who was once married to pop star Katy Perry between 2010 and 2012, showed little emotion as the verdicts were delivered. In the dock, he was observed speaking briefly to his wife, Laura Brand, and his legal counsel. His father, Ron Brand, expressed shock at the outcome, describing the situation as devastating. Afterwards he mouthed “I’m good, I’m good” to his defence counsel as he left the dock.